« We interrupt our regularly scheduled program... | Main | I don't want no stinkin' ring »

December 08, 2005



Ahh, you're so wrong.

Grooming: Sure, dogs would be cleaner -- if their owners washed them every day. Or even every week....

Training: Again, we could say that the potential is there but the reality isn't. Conceivably, dogs can be trained to do or not do things. I haven't met any who were.

Turd maintenance: Dogs lose that half point because dog owners do not SCOOP turds, they put a plastic bag over their hand and GRASP turds. I suppose SCOOPING a cold, dried tiny turd with a SCOOP could be considered grosser than GRASPING a big, hot steaming turd -- but who would really think that besides a crazy person?

Love: I ain't heard a no chihuahuas draggin' no people outta no burnin' buildings, neither. Unfair measurement.

Portability: How about the flip side to this, where if you're not home by 5:32 Rover will piss on your rug? I call this a tie.

Attractiveness to a potential mate: That one was more slanted than Fox News.

Ball stomping vs jumping up: Once again, dogs CAN be trained not to jump up, but from my experience the ones that don't are simply too fat, short, or lazy.

So there.

C Ro

LIES! All lies!


Regarding hygiene: What's up with dogs licking their private parts and then going for a big lick on their owner's face or other body parts. At least cats don't share all those extra body fuids with their owners. Just a thought... .

C Ro

Annon: I think this is on a per pet basis. I had a dog that didn't lick people and currently live with a cat that's always trying to lick my armpit. Gross!


Must be something about hairy armpits.

C Ro

Anon: How did you kn...ahem, I mean, my armpits are as perfect as perfect can be, thank you very much.


While it's not quite pulling someone out of a burning building ... http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060102/ap_on_re_us/911_cat_call;_ylt=AooCA_.vgAZsSR8PRH_6tuas0NUE;_ylu=X3oDMTA3ODdxdHBhBHNlYwM5NjQ-

The comments to this entry are closed.